Search EdWorkingPapers

Search for EdWorkingPapers here by author, title, or keywords.

Heterogeneous Major Preference for Extrinsic Incentives: The Effects of Wage Information on the Gender Gap in STEM Major Choice

Despite the growing evidence of informational interventions on college and major choices, we know little about how such light-touch interventions affect the gender gap in STEM majors. Linking survey data to administrative records of Chinese college applicants, we conducted a large-scale randomized experiment to examine the STEM gender gap in the major preference beliefs, application behaviors, and admissions outcomes. We find that female students are less likely to prefer, apply to, and enroll in STEM majors, particularly Engineering majors. In a school-level cluster randomized controlled trial, we provided treated students with major-specific wage information. Students’ major preferences are easily malleable that 39% of treated students updated their preferences after receiving the wage informational intervention. The wage informational intervention has no statistically significant impacts on female students’ STEM-related major applications and admissions. In contrast, those male students in rural areas who likely lack such information are largely shifted into STEM majors as a result of the intervention. We provide supporting evidence of heterogeneous major preferences for extrinsic incentives: even among those students who are most likely to be affected by the wage information (prefer high paying majors and lack the wage information), female students are less responsive to the informational intervention.

Keywords
major choice; STEM gender gap; informational intervention; preference heterogeneity
Education level
Document Object Identifier (DOI)
10.26300/ffz9-4v57

EdWorkingPaper suggested citation:

Ding, Yanqing, Wei Li, Xin Li, Yinduo Wu, Jin Yang, and Xiaoyang Ye. (). Heterogeneous Major Preference for Extrinsic Incentives: The Effects of Wage Information on the Gender Gap in STEM Major Choice. (EdWorkingPaper: 21-395). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/ffz9-4v57

Machine-readable bibliographic record: RIS, BibTeX